Vmt tax in infrastructure bill how to#
Vmt tax in infrastructure bill drivers#
Vmt tax in infrastructure bill registration#

The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category 'Analytics'. This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Let’s not do this, okay?Īnd another thing! If Biden only wants to make sure the rich are paying their “fair share” and he’s only going after millionaires and billionaires, etc., why does he want to monitor bank transactions of $600? Are billionaires moving money around in $600 increments? Or is this just another way to go after the little guy? The guy who can’t afford a tax lawyer to defend himself? Now it stands to reason that this would affect every person who drives and it would hurt the Little Guy the most! If I’m getting taxed by the amount of time I’m spending on the road and I’m hustling to make ends meet by driving Uber? My life just got a lot harder. And this VMT would seem to be a tax on every vehicle that uses roads. Biden that he would only be taxing those people who made over $400K a year. Which stands for a vehicle miles traveled tax. (RELATED: Here’s Some Shit That Don’t Make No Sense)

Vmt tax in infrastructure bill drivers#

They found a pilot plan to tax drivers by the mile hidden in the infrastructure bill.

NovemThis article was corrected to change 'million' to 'trillion' in the sixth paragraph.Hmmm, that’s weird.

Vmt tax in infrastructure bill registration#

It charges a flat fee of 1.8 cents per mile, and participants with gas or hybrid cars get a credit on the gas tax to cover the fee, while electric car owners get a rebate on their car registration costs.Ĭalifornia's pilot also set the tax at 1.8 cents per mile, while Utah's program charges 1.5 cents. Like the pilot in the infrastructure plan, it runs on a voluntary basis. According to Michelle Godfrey, a spokeswoman for the state's Department of Transportation, the program has been ongoing since 2015 and 'there is no end date for it.' Oregon is one of the states that received funding in 2017 for a road usage fee pilot program. 'The reason we are doing pilot programs, and this is all this is, a pilot program, (is) to examine the idea of the administrative burden that such a tax would create,' Auxier said, because a per-mile tax involves some sort of tracking or vehicles that gas taxes do not. Such pilot programs were part of a $15 million allocation in 2017 under the Trump administration to explore 'new ways to pay for highways.'

Vmt tax in infrastructure bill how to#

Per-mile tax pilot programs have been financed by the federal government in the past in order to find out how to address this problem, said Richard Auxier, an expert at the Tax Policy Center think tank. Improving fuel economy and limited growth in miles traveled are factors that have negatively affected the fund's revenues. The fund pays for federal highway spending through taxes on gasoline sales and heavy trucks. One of the reasons cited in the bill for carrying out the pilot program is 'to restore and maintain the long-term solvency of the Highway Trust Fund.' It does not set a specific cost, referring instead to an amount which 'may vary between vehicle types and weight classes to reflect estimated impacts on infrastructure, safety, congestion, the environment, or other related social impacts.'

The pilot program would allocate funds to experiment with a per-mile fee on a voluntary basis, according to the text of the bill. There is not a VMT (vehicle miles traveled) tax in the bill,' a US Department of Transportation spokesperson told AFP, adding that 'there is a pilot program just like there have been in previous reauthorization bills.'

The tax claim circulating online 'is not accurate. The text of the infrastructure bill does do so, but only in the context of establishing a pilot program to determine if such a system would work. This version of the $3.5 trillion package - for which various proposals are circulating - does not mention a per-mile tax. Also under consideration by Congress is a $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill that the progressive wing of the Democratic party has been reluctant to back without a commitment from centrists on the pricier spending package. ' Build Back Better' is the cornerstone of Biden's domestic agenda, and the name has been used in reference to a proposed $3.5 trillion social spending package. The image also appeared on Facebook here and Instagram here. Screenshot of a Facebook post taken on September 29, 2021